Well the affidavits are starting to trickle in.

Is monogamy the root of all equality?
An examination of the effects of polygamous marriage suggests it's bad for everyone in society, not just women

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/andrewbrown/2010/jul/26/religion...

Link to that actual document - Thanks to Vancouver Sun News

http://www.vancouversun.com/pdf/affidavit.pdf

After reading the said affidavit. I must also note that in any case that involves rights and freedoms of humans, the reference to humans as animals is appalling. One of the authorities being used by the Ministry of Attorney General references to humans as animals and compares primate behavior to humans. This reference case is about whether consenting adult have the constitutional right to choose what form of committed relationship they may enjoy. The fact that most women have a brain and know how to use it, and do use their independence in this day and time to get what they want, seems lost on the research. Yes recent history(last 2000 years) has shown that men controlled women. Mostly for control of the people so as to not let powers of good and righteous men and women grow, good men know that a good woman that raises good children rule the world. Rulers know that if you limit the growth of good people, then they will have less contend against the evil they wish to do.

It is a good read, most a specially the instructions from the Ministry of Attorney General representative,

“5. I was contacted in March of 2010 by Craig Jones of the British Columbia Ministry of Attorney General. Mr Jones described the Reference case to me and asked if I would be interested in studying the question of polygamy and its purported harms and preparing a report. Mr. Jones emphasized to me, and I understand, that my duty in preparing the report and, if called upon, in testifying, is to assist the Court and not be an advocate for any party. Mr Jones emphasized that I should follow the evidence where it leads and draw those conclusions I consider merited. He asked that if there were issues upon which scientific opinion diverged, I should note the dissenting views.”

Give both a good read.

Carl,